Knowledge fight

Each episode, knowledge fight, Dan and Jordan take a look at some clips from that day's Alex Jones Show and struggle to make sense of what they find. Sign In Sign In. New Customer? Create account.

Knowledge Fight is a podcast dedicated to analyzing and critiquing episodes of Alex Jones ' Infowars shows. The podcast was created in January In each episode, Friesen plays clips of noteworthy moments from one of Jones' shows, which are followed by Holmes' reactions. Along with Jones, Friesen and Holmes occasionally cover other conspiracy figures they consider to be relevant to their main subject on their 'Wacky Wednesday' episodes. The podcast series has been used by lawyers researching Alex Jones in relation to his various Sandy Hook lawsuits. Friesen has been called upon as an expert in Alex Jones and his shows by plaintiffs' lead counsel in Texas, Mark Bankston, because of the podcast series.

Knowledge fight

For years, one could listen to The Alex Jones Show and chuckle about how he's out of his mind, and thank your preferred deity that he's so far from being relevant that he's basically screaming into the void. As the world grew more troubling, the lies that Jones peddled on his show and website began to influence people with legitimate power. Dan and Jordan started Knowledge Fight in the belief that fighting against the deeply flawed philosophies of Alex Jones through debate is a fool's errand. They believe that mocking and documenting are far more powerful tools, and as such, that's what the podcast aims to do. A lot of times it's sent to an associated old email address you once used to sign-up with Eventbrite. Like many general admission venues, seats are limited and are on a first come first serve basis, so please arrive accordingly. If a seating accommodation is needed due to medical reasons , please reach out to us at hey littlefieldnyc. You must provide a valid photo ID to enter the venue. No exceptions. Please keep in mind this does NOT guarantee entry capacity permitting. We cannot offer you a discount. We recommend paying cash at the door the night of the event to avoid fees , or to keep an eye out for potential promo codes advertised by the producer. Cash and credit cards are accepted at the bar. It has showcased some of the best comedy, live music, dance parties, podcasts, art, film and theater.

Release date January 2, United States.

Each episode, Dan and Jordan take a look at some clips from that day's Alex Jones Show and struggle to make sense In this installment, Dan and Jordan find out what Alex's "secret mission" was. Turns out, he was invited to do As it turns out, In this installment, Dan and Jordan shoot back to the past to explore the day that Alex uncovered a nefarious

A study published Tuesday provides a newly-developed way to measure whether an AI model contains potentially hazardous knowledge, along with a technique for removing the knowledge from an AI system while leaving the rest of the model relatively intact. Together, the findings could help prevent AI models from being used to carry out cyberattacks and deploy bioweapons. The study was conducted by researchers from Scale AI, an AI training data provider, and the Center for AI Safety, a nonprofit, along with a consortium of more than 20 experts in biosecurity, chemical weapons, and cybersecurity. The subject matter experts generated a set of questions that, taken together, could assess whether an AI model can assist in efforts to create and deploy weapons of mass destruction. As the AI industry continues to make rapid progress , safety is top of mind for world leaders. However, the techniques that AI companies currently use to control the outputs of their systems are easy to circumvent. And the tests used to assess whether an AI model could be dangerous are expensive and time-consuming. The researchers at Scale AI and the Center for AI Safety began by asking experts in biosecurity, chemical weapons, and cybersecurity to catalog the different ways in which harms could arise in their area of expertise.

Knowledge fight

The vast majority of Philippine nationals would fight to defend their country, according to a poll conducted as China's territorial challenge to the U. Overall, 77 percent of respondents answered "Yes" when asked if they were ready to fight in a hypothetical "conflict between the Philippines and a foreign enemy," according to pollsters from independent consulting firm OCTA Research. The survey was released Sunday on the heels of last week's escalation of tensions in the Beijing-claimed South China Sea. For the second time in three months , the China Coast Guard deployed water cannons while aggressively moving to block a Philippine convoy bearing supplies and troops to a military outpost at Second Thomas Shoal. One supply boat turned back after a water cannon damaged it and injured four crew members. Since last year, the Philippines has been publicizing China's actions within the Southeast Asian country's internationally recognized mile exclusive economic zone EEZ. Broken down by age, the OCTA Research poll showed 74 percent of 18 to year-olds would fight for their country. That's within the margin of error of the 77 percent who said the same among the 35 to 44 and to year-old demographics. City dwellers 80 percent were more likely to say they'd fight for their country than people living in rural areas 73 percent.

Broken but beautiful song download

Retrieved This debate truly has it all. Contribute to this page Suggest an edit or add missing content. Hillary's 6 Picks for March and Beyond. Report this event. Browse episodes. Every episode exposes more about how we got to our current political divide. View fullsize. Knowledge Fight Dan is a gentleman who holds an unhealthy obsession with InfoWars. They encounter an appearance by the most important figure in modern history, Steve Piezcenik, and a special report about board games that they covered over episodes ago. Toggle limited content width. Customer Reviews. In this installment, Dan and Jordan checkin to see how Alex covered the release of Tucker Carlson's interview with Putin.

Each episode, Dan and Jordan take a look at some clips from that day's Alex Jones Show and struggle to make sense of what they find.

Our podcast is nearly impossible to sell to you. Edit page Add episode. In this installment, Dan and Jordan dip back to the past to find Alex covering the most important issues of the day, including an angry divorcee in Alabama putting up signs in his yard and some guy in Oregon stealing a chicken. Can't wait to hear what he says without fox having his back! Turns out, he was invited to do a post-State of the Union show with Tucker Carlson, which is ends up barely involving the State of the Union. Mocking and documenting with Dan and Jordan! Apple Podcasts Preview. Browse episodes. Friday, May In this installment, Dan and Jordan check in on Alex's Sunday show, and find him attempting to cover Cheerios and a pandemic preparedness treaty, but ends up mostly just being a bit racist. Puzzle in a Thunderstorm, LLC. Report this event. In this installment, Dan and Jordan shoot back to the past to explore the day that Alex uncovered a nefarious plot to steal the New Hampshire primary from Ron Paul. In each episode, Friesen plays clips of noteworthy moments from one of Jones' shows, which are followed by Holmes' reactions. In this installment, Jordan welcomes back to the show author and podcaster Jon Ronson to discuss his show Things Fell Apart , which has a new season out now.