Dr craig childress

I want to point out some specific things.

I have been sanctioned by the forensic psychologists on the Oregon licensing board for practice in Oregon without a license because of a consultation report I wrote for the Conscious Co-Parenting Institute Dorcy Pruter, CEO , a business organization in California the state where I am licensed regarding frequency counts for the three Diagnostic Indicators for the pathology in the family courts that I describe in my book Foundations Childress, ORS I provided consulting services to the Conscious Co-Parenting Institute, a business organization in California, the state where I am licensed, regarding the data profile they generated from their content analysis and coding research that is based on my work. I did not supervise direct psychological services and I did not treat any behavioral, emotional or mental disorder of an individual. I never met with anyone in Oregon. My entire opinion contained in my consultation report to the Conscious Co-Parenting Institute, a business organization in California, the state where I am licensed, is based entirely on just three numbers:. As I describe in my book, Foundations Childress, , when the three Diagnostic Indicators I identify are present in the child symptom display, there is ONLY one possible explanation, i.

Dr craig childress

At some point you will want to purchase and read a copy of Dr. It is very clinical, so prepare yourself by becoming familiar with the material listed below before deciding if you want to go ahead and get the book. This is an excellent , easy to understand article about the basics of Attachment-Based Parental Alienation. It is not written by Dr. Consultation with Dr. This is a list of answers to frequently asked questions that Dr. Childress receives from targeted parents. Sort Showing Newest first. Note: Dr. Childress recently updated his website and so most of the document links here no longer work. In my spare time I will be working on fixing these links. In the meantime, it may be easier to just go directly to his website and browse the documents there.

Consistent with the findings of the NY Blue Ribbon Commission on Forensic Custody Evaluations, dr craig childress, I strongly recommend that the practice of forensic custody evaluations be eliminated from all courts nationally and internationally.

.

Grandiosity: The child sits in a grandiose position of judgment of the targeted parent as both a parent and as a person. Absence of Empathy: The child displays a complete absence of empathy and compassion for the targeted parent. Haughty and Arrogant Attitude: The child displays an arrogant attitude of haughty contempt and disdain for the targeted parent. The child evidences an intransigently held, fixed-and-false belief i. Persistent Unwarranted Fear : The child will display a persistent and unwarranted fear of the targeted-rejected parent that is cued by either by the presence of the targeted parent or in anticipation of being in the presence of the targeted parent DSM-5 Phobia criterion A.

Dr craig childress

I have been sanctioned by the forensic psychologists on the Oregon licensing board for practice in Oregon without a license because of a consultation report I wrote for the Conscious Co-Parenting Institute Dorcy Pruter, CEO , a business organization in California the state where I am licensed regarding frequency counts for the three Diagnostic Indicators for the pathology in the family courts that I describe in my book Foundations Childress, ORS I provided consulting services to the Conscious Co-Parenting Institute, a business organization in California, the state where I am licensed, regarding the data profile they generated from their content analysis and coding research that is based on my work. I did not supervise direct psychological services and I did not treat any behavioral, emotional or mental disorder of an individual. I never met with anyone in Oregon.

Soad toxicity lyrics

It is deeply unfortunate that I must leave the family courts as an expert consultant and testifying expert witness, but it simply has become too professionally dangerous to remain as long as the forensic psychologists control the licensing boards. Journal of General Psychology, 97, I have direct child abuse and trauma background. Required — not optional. Pathogenic parenting is not a child custody issue, it is a child protection issue. Everyone can read the statute. As a result of the sanctions delivered against me by the forensic psychologists on the Oregon licensing board and their grounds, it is no longer safe for me to continue to provide consultation or expert testimony to anyone in the family courts, including attorneys. What exactly I did in Oregon that constitutes practice in Oregon remains unclear. So I did that. Everyone can decide for themselves. Legislation to protect children from child abuse should specify that in all cases of court-involved child custody conflict involving severe attachment pathology displayed by a child, a proper risk assessment for possible child abuse needs to be conducted to the appropriate differential diagnosis for each parent. Until the corruption of the licensing boards by the forensic psychologists is cleansed and resolved, it will be too professionally dangerous for any clinical psychologists to work in the family courts, including me. This was to address the need created by forensic psychologists withholding symptom information from parents. Mercer is not competent by her background education, training, and experience to opine on issues of pathology — any pathology, its assessment, diagnosis, or treatment. In all cases of severe attachment pathology a child rejecting a parent , a proper risk assessment needs to be conducted to the appropriate differential diagnosis for each parent.

It is not a matter of belief. We begin the construction of any structure by first laying a solid foundation that can support the structure.

This has implicatons. Better-doctor and Bad-doctor fail to conduct a proper risk assessment for possible Child Psychological Abuse? The definition of a persecutory delusion is provided by the American Psychiatric Association. This is spousal abuse using the child as the weapon. We must first diagnose what the pathology is before we know how to treat it. There are cats. In legislation providing guidance to court decisions on child custody, the legitimate concerns of both litigants need a fair and balanced examination. This research article reports on the data from 46 families involved in court-involved highly litigated custody conflict. That will lay the foundation. Her doctorate degree was 55 years ago in Experimental psychology, not Clinical psychology.