Sudo apt get autoremove
Most of us with Debian-based systems use apt-get routinely to install packages and upgrades, but how often do we pull out the cleaning tools?
Managing packages on Linux-based systems can be a complex task, especially when it comes to uninstalling software. Debian, Ubuntu, and their derivatives utilize the Advanced Package Tool APT for package management, offering various commands for different uninstallation scenarios. It removes the specified package along with its configuration files, but it does not delete any associated system-wide configuration files or user data. This command also leaves behind dependencies that were installed with the removed package, which might not be required anymore. Uninstalls the specified package. Keeps system-wide configuration files and user data.
Sudo apt get autoremove
Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. I'm not sure what sudo apt-get autoremove does, but have read that you should use this command to remove any unnecessary packages. One of the processes I saw was to use sudo apt-get autoremove and then use something like BleachBit to remove temp files etc. Can you explain what sudo apt-get autoremove actually does and is there any advantages of using this command over something like BleachBit or Ubuntu Tweak janitor by themselves? Whenever you install an application using apt-get the system will also install the software that this application depends on. When you remove the application the dependency will stay on your system. So apt-get autoremove will remove those dependencies that were installed with applications and are no longer used by anything else on the system. Using one option does not exclude the other: I would assume BB and UTJ use sudo apt-get autoremove in some sort of way to remove dependencies. So it is not a question of "any advantages. One minor addition: Since Ubuntu Community Ask! Stack Overflow for Teams — Start collaborating and sharing organizational knowledge.
Remove packages that are installed to meet the dependencies of other packages, but are no longer needed because either the program has been uninstalled or got updated packages, sudo apt get autoremove. Post by Termy » Wed Feb 23, pm Just a guess, but it's possible that Linux Mint have somehow set it so that packages marked as dependencies for the initial packages installed with the system, or rather, packages not 'manually' installed, are prevented from being automatically removed. This method will largely present the detail in a more complete manner in my opinion anyway If your situation is solved, none of sudo apt get autoremove matters.
Linux Shout. Ubuntu is one of the popular Linux distros for both Servers and Desktops. It really helps a lot to new users. Out of hundreds of command that we run on the Ubuntu command terminal, we often use Autoclean, Clean, and Autoremove. But what is the difference between them?
Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. I understand that apt-get remove removes packages and apt-get autoremove is to remove any packages that were installed to fulfil a dependency for a given package. So for example if I installed LibreOffice and it had dependencies on say Java and installed it as part of the installation when I run the command apt-get libreoffice , why would I run the command apt-get remove libreoffice followed by apt-get autoremove? Am I not able to simply run the command apt-get autoremove libreoffice? Or is the combination of apt-get remove and apt-get autoremove for a different purpose? It depends on how much you trust the dependancy tracker.
Sudo apt get autoremove
Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. It will also leave dependencies installed with it on installation time untouched. Both commands are equivalent.
Lactation comics
Who owns this tool? IDC reports on how to measure business impact. I must get back to learning vi… Anyway, I found the entry for that date: Start-Date: Install: libfuse2:amd64 2. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Grepnix October 21, , am 4. Post by Termy » Wed Feb 23, pm. You can mark such a package as manually installed by using apt-mark 8. One of the processes I saw was to use sudo apt-get autoremove and then use something like BleachBit to remove temp files etc. For example, to uninstall a package completely and clean up any unused dependencies, you can run the following sequence of commands:. Grepnix October 22, , am 6. Packages are updated fairly frequently and commands like apt-get update and apt-get upgrade make the process quite easy. For systemd, it was in August This is a good practice because in most cases these packages are useless. Generative AI Networking.
Linux Shout.
In this way, now and again, we can free up some space of our Ubuntu or Debian running PC using these three commands. But the number seemed rather high. It helps to keep your cache from growing too large. Upcoming privacy updates: removal of the Activity data section and Google Improve this answer. Just running sudo apt-get autoremove seems safer to me. For this I used Synaptic. Grepnix October 22, , am 6. This command also leaves behind dependencies that were installed with the removed package, which might not be required anymore. If autoremove isn't removing a package, you can rest assured it's very likely for a good reason.
The question is interesting, I too will take part in discussion. I know, that together we can come to a right answer.