Plastic ban reversal

GlobalNews home Video Categories.

Trade is tricky. The Trading Post is not. Sign up to receive easy to understand updates, events, and guides on international trade. In June , the Government of Canada announced a plan to ban the sale, manufacture, and importation of single-use plastics starting as early as , a plan that would come to full fruition in December On November 16th, , the single-use plastic ban was overturned by a Canadian court, and while that decision may feel like a green light to you as an importer, we urge restraint and caution. The single-use plastics prohibition regulations include:.

Plastic ban reversal

A court decision that quashed the legal foundations of Canada's plastic regulations might not spell the end of the government's efforts to tackle the plastic pollution problem, observers say. On Thursday, a Federal Court judge sided with the petrochemical industry in a ruling against the federal government's decision to list plastic as toxic under federal pollution legislation. A product can be considered legally "toxic" if it harms or could harm the environment or human health. This designation allows the federal government to develop regulations like Canada's ban on straws, plastic bags and four other single-use plastic items. The ruling found the federal government overstepped its authority to regulate substances by listing all plastic items as toxic, instead of specific items shown to cause environmental harm. Typically, a substance is listed as legally toxic if a government risk assessment shows it is both harmful and likely to enter the environment. In a departure from this method, the government justified its decision to list plastics as toxic using a " science assessment " that reviewed roughly scientific papers about plastic pollution and concluded the material poses a threat, but it did not assess the risk that all plastics would end up in the environment. That evaluation came later and is used to justify the ban on some single-use items. The judge determined the federal government's decision to use this unconventional method in justifying the toxic listing wasn't strong enough but did not foreclose all efforts to control the plastic pollution problem. The decision "does nothing" for people who want to bring back plastic straws or plastic grocery store bags, he said. The plastics industry is treating the toxics designation as a "sword of Damocles" hanging over them because it gives the federal government the authority to start regulating any plastic with minimal notice or consultation. Despite the massive scale of plastic pollution, the handful of companies producing the material have largely avoided measures that could force them to deal with the pollution their products create.

Standard Trading Conditions available here.

The Alberta government is happy with a court decision that ruled Canada's plastics ban was too broad when it came to determining which ones were toxic to the environment. On Thursday, the Federal Court found the cabinet order that said all items manufactured out of plastic were harmful was not a reasonable determination for the government to make. The decision could therefore lead to changes for the ban on six single-use plastic items that include straws, grocery bags and takeout containers. Current federal regulations are banning the manufacture and import of those single-use plastic items, but a full ban on their sale and export isn't expected until The Alberta and Saskatchewan governments both went to court to fight the initial ban, calling it unconstitutional.

But one environmental law expert believes that in the long term, the ban of those specific items will stand up to legal scrutiny. The Liberal cabinet designated plastic manufactured items as toxic in , in order to allow the environment minister to regulate their use in Canada. In December , the first of those regulations took effect, barring the manufacture and import of six types of single-use plastics, including straws, grocery bags, cutlery, takeout containers, stir sticks and six-pack beverage rings. And she said that surely includes some items for which there is no reasonable expectation of environmental harm. Your guide to the world of Canadian politics. Subscriber exclusive on Saturdays. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way.

Plastic ban reversal

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first. If you get Global News from Instagram or Facebook - that will be changing. Find out how you can still connect with us. And it is also raising questions about whether the plastic bags , straws and takeout containers listed under the ban could make a comeback.

Jj korean chicken & bbq menu

Close X. Not only that, but the actual legal proceedings surrounding this can be long and protracted, from appeals - which are starting already - to interim orders; there are myriad ways that this can continue for many months and years to come. You need an active subscription to post a comment. Sponsored content. A mother from Terrebonne, Que. Close Local your local region National. The Trading Post is not. And Other Questions and Resolutions for Read about us. She thought she watched her son die. But for the particular court that made this decision. The ruling found the federal government overstepped its authority to regulate substances by listing all plastic items as toxic, instead of specific items shown to cause environmental harm. If you get Global News from Instagram or Facebook - that will be changing. Trending Now.

Canada's single-use plastic regulations face their first legal test today as the plastics lobby and the federal government head to court. A federal court judge will hear arguments from lawyers on all sides from Tuesday to Thursday in Toronto. The federal judge, who is not expected to deliver a ruling for months, must consider whether Ottawa was justified when it listed plastic products as toxic under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act.

Walmart Canada says its work to eliminate plastic bags from its stores began in and it estimates this removes million from circulation annually. Journalistic standards Comment Report an error. It is important to note, however, that provinces, including British Columbia and Ontario, and cities such as Calgary, are carrying forward with the federal ban. Canadians will soon have to adjust their clocks an hour ahead as we draw closer to the start of spring. The decision for the ban was rooted in confronting the alarming amount of plastic waste that ends up in landfills, natural habitats, and waterways. Vancouver Island. Sussex officials say they have a solution to address flooding concerns, but it comes with a large price tag Water levels return to normal on weekend, but damage lingers following flash-flooding in Sussex last week. Find out how you can still connect with us. And it is also raising questions about whether the plastic bags , straws and takeout containers listed under the ban could make a comeback. Airline analysts warn travellers to be wary as they can be lured in by a low advertised price for flights with some hidden fees bringing the overall cost of the trip way up. Turkeys terrorize residents of small Quebec town. The decision found that the classification of plastics in the cabinet order was too broad to be listed on the List of Toxic Substances in Schedule 1 and the government acted outside of its authority. In , Gloria also participated in the Canadian Produce Marketing Association and the Canadian Horticultural Council advocacy event "Fall Harvest" in Ottawa where she participated in advocacy efforts for the Canadian produce industry. Description November 17,