Painting of churchill sutherland

It is his eightieth birthday.

Sutherland Graham, , after. Portrait of Sir Winston Churchill, circa s, full-length oil on canvas portrait of Winston Churchill seated, some cracking and flaking of paint surface, Sutherland received 1, guineas for the painting, a sum funded by donations from members of the House of Commons and House of Lords. The painting was presented to Churchill by both Houses of Parliament at a public ceremony in Westminster Hall on his 80th birthday on 30 November The painting was intended to hang in the Houses of Parliament after Churchill's death, but after the public presentation, it was instead given as a personal gift to Churchill himself, who took it to Chartwell and refused to display it as he found the portrait deeply unflattering. After the death of Lady Spencer-Churchill in , it came to light the following year that she had destroyed the painting within a year of its arrival at Chartwell, by breaking it into pieces and having them incinerated to prevent it from causing further distress to her husband. She had hidden the Sutherland portrait in the cellars at Chartwell and employed her private secretary Grace Hamblin and Hamblin's brother to remove it in the middle of the night and burn it in a remote location.

Painting of churchill sutherland

It was disliked by Churchill and eventually destroyed shortly after. Sutherland received 1, guineas [a] in compensation for the painting, a sum funded by donations from members of the House of Commons and House of Lords. Finding the depiction deeply unflattering, Churchill disliked the portrait intensely. After its public presentation, the painting was taken to his country home at Chartwell but not displayed. For a long time it was assumed that it was destroyed by Lady Spencer-Churchill ; however, in the course of research for a biography of Churchill, audio recordings were cited that attribute the destruction to Grace Hamblin, Churchill's private secretary. According to this, the painting was taken by her and her brother to a secluded house and burned. Clementine Churchill learned of the deed the next morning and approved. By the time the portrait had been commissioned, Churchill was an elder statesman nearing the end of his second period as prime minister. Sutherland had gained a reputation as a modernist painter through some recent successful portraits, such as Somerset Maugham in He was drawn to depicting subjects as they truly were without embellishment; some sitters considered his disinclination to flattery as a form of cruelty or disparagement to his subjects. Sutherland and Churchill had different hopes for the painting. Churchill had wanted to direct the composition towards a fictionalised scene but Sutherland had insisted upon a realistic portrayal, one described by Simon Schama as "No bulldog, no baby face.

View all lots in this sale. Additionally, Sutherland worked from photographs by Elsbeth Juda.

Q Recently on BBC Radio 4, antiquarian book dealer Rick Gekoski spoke of the Sutherland portrait of Churchill, commissioned by Parliament as a tribute on his 80th birthday in , saying it was destroyed by his wife because she hated it so much. It portrayed the PM hunched with age and dark in mood. A detailed study by the artist still hangs in the National Portrait Gallery. Gekoski asked if the rights of an owner override those of the public, and if the Churchills had the moral right to destroy it. It certainly combines force with candour. From Martin Gilbert, Winston S. Churchill , vol.

It is his eightieth birthday. They present him with the gift of a portrait, paid for by parliamentary subscription. They intend it to remain with him for his lifetime, and then to hang in the Palace of Westminster. It certainly combines force and candour. These are qualities which no active Member of either House can do without or should fear to meet.

Painting of churchill sutherland

Q Recently on BBC Radio 4, antiquarian book dealer Rick Gekoski spoke of the Sutherland portrait of Churchill, commissioned by Parliament as a tribute on his 80th birthday in , saying it was destroyed by his wife because she hated it so much. It portrayed the PM hunched with age and dark in mood. A detailed study by the artist still hangs in the National Portrait Gallery. Gekoski asked if the rights of an owner override those of the public, and if the Churchills had the moral right to destroy it. It certainly combines force with candour.

900 chml

This charge will be added to your invoice automatically. Endnotes and further reading 1 Robert Rhodes James, ed. John Lawrence. Factum Arte Collaborators Partners. This time, one of the re-creations done prior to the London visit was printed on raw canvas, immediately making a difference to the brown tones of the portrait. Despatch Box Read More. The short-lived Sutherland portrait, Article Talk. Additionally, Sutherland worked from photographs by Elsbeth Juda. Some further details were added in paint. Sutherland received 1, guineas [a] in compensation for the painting, a sum funded by donations from members of the House of Commons and House of Lords. Payment is preferred by direct Bank Transfer to our bank account. Lady Spencer-Churchill thought it was a good resemblance — "really quite alarmingly like him" — but also said it made him look too cross, while recognising that it was a familiar expression. They put it in the back of his van and drove to his house several miles away, and then scurried round the side of his house into the back garden, built a huge bonfire and put it on so that no-one could see it from the street. Artist's Resale Rights "Droit de Suite".

It was disliked by Churchill and eventually destroyed shortly after. Sutherland received 1, guineas [a] in compensation for the painting, a sum funded by donations from members of the House of Commons and House of Lords. Finding the depiction deeply unflattering, Churchill disliked the portrait intensely.

The painting is an extraordinary homage to Churchill. This right shall be exercisable without prejudice to any other right of the Auctioneer. A member of our staff will telephone you a few minutes before bidding commences on your specified lot and will bid on your behalf, according to your instructions. Payment can be made in cash at the Cashier's Office, either during or after the sale. But what really happened between the painter and the prime minister? He had rallied his country at a time of mortal peril. These companies will require payment direct for their services. Image Upload Drag and drop. Sir Winston saw his political and personal powers fading. The legend needed no portrait. In addition to this, it is a singularly disagreeable sepia colour, and I would not call it an ornament to any wall. These varied materials were employed by the Factum Arte team in the re-creation of this iconic image.