Mg4 ancap

The MG4 is the first MG to receive this rating under the recent rating criteria, and did so despite the autonomous emergency breaking system being unable to detect pedestrians while the car is in reverse, mg4 ancap. MG4 received high scores in a few mg4 ancap the 4 key areas.

Applicable to all MG 4 grades sold in Australia and New Zealand, the electric hatchback received scores of 83 per cent for Adult Occupant Protection, 86 per cent for Child Occupant Protection, 75 per cent for Vulnerable Road User Protection pedestrians and cyclists , and 81 per cent for Safety Assist technology. According to ANCAP, the MG 4 performed well across the Child Occupant Protection tests, taking full marks for dynamic side impacts while scoring high in the dynamic front impact and restraint installation criteria. The electric hatchback also scored well for Adult Occupant Protection, taking perfect scores across the side impact, oblique pole, and rescue and extraction tests — though it fared poorly for far side impacts due the lack of a centre airbag which reduces the risk of front-seat occupants clashing heads in a crash. ANCAP noted the MG 4 posted strong results for a majority of its safety assist systems — such as seat belt reminders, driver monitoring, and autonomous emergency braking AEB junction assist — while all other features scored well. Jordan is a self-described iRacing addict and can be found on weekends either behind the wheel of his Octavia RS or swearing at his ZH Fairlane.

Mg4 ancap

The MG 4 Electric is fitted with a range of collision avoidance technologies including autonomous emergency braking, active lane support, and fatigue monitoring. Mixed results were seen in AEB Pedestrian test scenarios. AEB Backover functionality, designed to detect and respond to pedestrians in reverse, is not available. The lane support system fitted to the MG 4 Electric showed Good performance in lane keep assist test scenarios, and Adequate performance in the more critical emergency lane keeping scenarios. Structurally, maximum points were awarded to the MG 4 Electric for its protection of adult occupants in the side impact and oblique pole tests. The MPDB test - which also assesses vehicle-to-vehicle compatibility — showed that the MG 4 Electric presented a relatively low injury risk to occupants of an oncoming vehicle, with a modest penalty of 0. The MG 4 Electric is however not fitted with a centre airbag or similar countermeasure to prevent contact between front seat occupants, and prevention of excursion movement to the other side of the vehicle was assessed as Adequate for the vehicle-to-vehicle scenario, and Poor for the vehicle-to-pole scenario. Strong scores were seen for the protection of child occupants in the front and side impact crash tests. Full details on the safety performance of the MG 4 Electric can be viewed here. Something went wrong. Media Contact.

Riz Akhtar. Fri 23 Feb 0. Our future can be safe AND green.

The budget-friendly EV scored maximum points for protecting adult occupants in the side impact and pole tests, with a mix of good to marginal results in the full-width frontal and frontal offset tests. Penalties were applied for excessive forward movement of the rear passenger dummy in the full-width frontal test and the potential of hard contact to the driver knees in the mobile progressive deformable barrier MPDB test. Meanwhile, blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert are only available from the top-spec Essence 64 variant. Good results were determined from its front AEB cyclist system, but had mixed results for some vehicle and pedestrian detection scenarios. The rating applies to all MG 4 variants, except the X-Power hot electric hatch which is all but confirmed for Australian launch later this year.

The passenger compartment of the MG 4 Electric remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger but some structures in the dashboard were thought to present a hazard for occupants of different sizes or to those sitting in different positions. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the car would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, dummy readings indicated good or adequate protection of all critical body areas. However, analysis post-test analysis of the film showed that the head of the rear passenger dummy had moved forward more than is recommended, and protection of that body area was rated as marginal. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, all critical parts of the body were well protected and the MG 4 Electric scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. Control of excursion the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side was poor. The MG 4 Electric does not have a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.

Mg4 ancap

The budget-friendly EV scored maximum points for protecting adult occupants in the side impact and pole tests, with a mix of good to marginal results in the full-width frontal and frontal offset tests. Penalties were applied for excessive forward movement of the rear passenger dummy in the full-width frontal test and the potential of hard contact to the driver knees in the mobile progressive deformable barrier MPDB test. Meanwhile, blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert are only available from the top-spec Essence 64 variant. Good results were determined from its front AEB cyclist system, but had mixed results for some vehicle and pedestrian detection scenarios. The rating applies to all MG 4 variants, except the X-Power hot electric hatch which is all but confirmed for Australian launch later this year. ANCAP is also expected to soon start subjecting vehicles to the stricter testing criteria.

Zara quilted jacket

Lane-keep assist also showed good performance in various tests and was adequate in emergency lane-keeping situations. Submit Owner Car Review. ANCAP is also expected to soon start subjecting vehicles to the stricter testing criteria. Structurally, maximum points were awarded to the MG 4 Electric for its protection of adult occupants in the side impact and oblique pole tests. Rare Aussie V8 coupe offered for sale. New Car Deals. Drop Off Time 7. Drive Journalists. Preferred Date and Time. But the system was not available to detect pedestrians when the vehicle was in reverse. Selling Advice. ANCAP noted the MG 4 posted strong results for a majority of its safety assist systems — such as seat belt reminders, driver monitoring, and autonomous emergency braking AEB junction assist — while all other features scored well. Good results were determined from its front AEB cyclist system, but had mixed results for some vehicle and pedestrian detection scenarios. Drive Team.

The MG 4 Electric is fitted with a range of collision avoidance technologies including autonomous emergency braking, active lane support, and fatigue monitoring. Mixed results were seen in AEB Pedestrian test scenarios.

Something went wrong. Drive Team. Drive Journalists. Tweet 0. Gallery 3. Cars for Sale. ANCAP noted the MG 4 posted strong results for a majority of its safety assist systems — such as seat belt reminders, driver monitoring, and autonomous emergency braking AEB junction assist — while all other features scored well. Isabella Kendall. Your Details. Work Cars. Search for: Search. Meanwhile, blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert are only available from the top-spec Essence 64 variant. Car Guides.