Juan garcia abrego sentence

Gerald H. Defendant-appellant Juan Garcia Abrego appeals his conviction and sentence for ten counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U. We affirm.

Juan Garcia Abrego, described as the leader of a powerful drug ring based in Mexico, was convicted on October 16 on drug trafficking charges Deborah Tedford and Jo Ann Zuniga, "Cocaine kingpin is guilty," Houston Chronicle , October 17, , p. A4; "U. A3; Bruce Nichols, "U. After a four-week trial and twelve hours of deliberation, a jury in U. District Court in Houston convicted Garcia Abrego on all 22 counts of money laundering, drug possession and drug trafficking. Garcia Abrego, 52, faces up to life in prison, and is scheduled to be sentenced on January 31, Mike Ramsey, Garcia Abrego's lawyer, called the proceedings a "show trial" during his closing arguments.

Juan garcia abrego sentence

Those penalties, along with an order permitting the U. After U. Assistant Atty. Several witnesses, all of them imprisoned in the U. But none implicated senior Mexican or U. The pursuit and prosecution of Garcia Abrego, 52, was said to typify an aggressive, cooperative new attack on the multibillion-dollar, cross-border drug trade by U. Mexican prosecutors, however, recently have suffered serious setbacks in their attempts to win similar prison terms for major traffickers. Palma was arrested last year, along with dozens of federal police who were protecting him, after an airplane crash. The Guadalajara judge sentenced him to six years in jail on illegal weapons charges. He was arrested a year ago near Monterrey, Mexico, by a squad of Mexican anti-drug agents.

Hilario Gonzales subsequently ordered Guadalupe Manuel Lopez to rent a large U-Haul truck, load it with clothing and furniture, juan garcia abrego sentence, and turn it over to other individuals in the southwest part of Houston. He therefore contends that his later custodial statement at the FBI office was presumptively involuntary because he was not provided access to a lawyer prior to the statement. Garcia Abrego's claim again lacks merit.

.

After 10 years of investigation, a monthlong trial and 11 hours of deliberation, a federal jury here convicted Garcia Abrego, 52, on all 22 counts of drug-trafficking and money laundering--parts of a criminal conspiracy that witnesses said protected itself with millions of dollars in monthly bribes to officials on both sides of the border. After the verdict, prosecutors and defense attorneys indicated that Garcia Abrego--who fought back emotion as he listened through headphones to the Spanish translation of a verdict that could result in a maximum sentence of life in prison--has no plans to cooperate with U. They are investigating widespread corruption that they say continues to aid the drug trade in Mexico. The trial drew wide attention from many in the U. The cartel was said to have paid off U. National Guard troops to escort their tons of cocaine across the border.

Juan garcia abrego sentence

Those penalties, along with an order permitting the U. After U. Assistant Atty. Several witnesses, all of them imprisoned in the U. But none implicated senior Mexican or U.

Allecakes leaked

Garcia Abrego initially challenges the admissibility of the foreign bank records under 18 U. Raymer, F. Garcia Abrego contends that the district court erred in admitting evidence that he ordered a number of murders. Garcia Abrego conclusorily argues that insufficient evidence existed for the jury to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that he acted as an organizer, supervisor, or manager of five or more individuals in his narcotics trafficking activities. As an initial matter, we note that Garcia Abrego does not contest that sufficient evidence exists to prove that the substantive drug offenses alleged were committed by someone; rather he alleges that the evidence was insufficient to link the offenses to him. Toggle button Get free summaries of new Fifth Circuit U. Among the post-October evidence supporting Garcia Abrego's conviction of conspiracy to launder money is the testimony of Carlos Resendez that he participated in a large cocaine transaction in and turned the proceeds over to Garcia Abrego in Monterey, Mexico. See Miller, F. Garcia Abrego next argues that admission of the foreign records violated his rights under the Confrontation Clause because he was unable to cross examine the custodian of the records. US State Law. He therefore contends that his later custodial statement at the FBI office was presumptively involuntary because he was not provided access to a lawyer prior to the statement. Garcia Abrego contends that the district court erred in allowing Dr.

He started in the cartel under the tutelage of his uncle Juan Nepomuceno Guerra. Reports date his trafficking career beginning in the mids, exporting marijuana from Mexico into the U.

Coleman's opinion. The van drove to the Ridgeside residence and backed up to the residence's garage. Admission of the evidence did not violate Rule Because Rule operates to exclude relevant evidence, application of the rule " 'must be cautious and sparing. Several witnesses, all of them imprisoned in the U. During an investigation that began in , Garcia Abrego was first indicted in federal court in Dallas in The record contains ample evidence from which the district court could conclude that the drugs that Mexican authorities administered to Garcia Abrego did not impair his mental capacity. Some witnesses testified to wide-spread corruption in Mexican law enforcement, and implicated officials in the United States. But as a physician who prescribes the medication, I certainly know quite a bit about it. Find a Lawyer. Subsection b of section is intended to promote the resolution before trial of questions concerning the admissibility of foreign business records. In addition to trafficking narcotics, Garcia Abrego's business also included providing "protection" to other drug traffickers moving narcotics through the Matamoros area. This court has observed that " [n]o practice is more ingrained in our criminal justice system than the practice of the government calling a witness who is an accessory to the crime for which the defendant is charged and having that witness testify under a plea bargain that promises him a reduced sentence.