Givewell

Donations to the Top Charities Fund are granted on a rolling basis to its top charities with the highest-priority funding needs, givewell, givewell. Supporting the Top Charities Fund givewell GiveWell to direct funds where they will have the most impact according to its latest cost-effectiveness estimates and research on funding needs.

We research each program extensively before funding it, and assess what the program accomplishes with that funding. We look at independent studies, such as randomized controlled trials, of charity programs to understand if they achieve their goals. We also consult experts to gain practical and context-specific insights. We refine these throughout our evaluation process, based on budgets and monitoring data, to estimate impact per dollar spent. We conduct extensive interviews with staff from potential grantee organizations. We may visit them to see their work in action. We review potential grantees' past spending and forecast their future spending to better understand their track record and expected impact.

Givewell

GiveWell is an American non-profit charity assessment and effective altruism -focused organization. GiveWell focuses primarily on the cost-effectiveness of the organizations that it evaluates, rather than traditional metrics such as the percentage of the organization's budget that is spent on overhead. In , Holden Karnofsky and Elie Hassenfeld, who worked at a hedge fund in Connecticut, formed an informal group with colleagues to evaluate charities based on data and performance metrics similar to those they used at the fund, and were surprised to find the data often didn't exist. In the first year, Karnofsky and Hassenfeld advocated that charities should generally spend more money on overhead, so that they could pay for staff and record keeping to track how effective their efforts were; this ran counter to standard ways of evaluating charities based on the ratio of overhead to funds deployed for the charity work itself. In late , GiveWell's founders promoted the organization on several internet blogs and forums using sockpuppets to ask questions about where to find good information about how to donate and then answering them, recommending GiveWell. In , GiveWell moved its offices to San Francisco where people in Silicon Valley had become strong supporters of the effective altruism philosophy. Givewell's approach is data-driven, and they recommend charities which work in the developing world. Open Philanthropy has investigated giving money to criminal justice reform [13] and a range of other policy areas, [14] and has funded work into mitigating risks of artificial intelligence , [15] [16] [17] biosecurity , [18] and global health. GiveWell makes annual recommendations of the most cost-effective charities. Contents move to sidebar hide. Article Talk. Read Edit View history. Tools Tools. Download as PDF Printable version. In other projects.

Bloomberg Business.

.

We extensively research each charity before recommending it. We continue evaluations each year after. We look at independent studies of charity programs, such as randomized controlled trials, to understand their effectiveness. We build in-depth models to analyze charities' cost-effectiveness. We refine this throughout our charity evaluation process, based on their budget and monitoring, to estimate impact per dollar spent.

Givewell

GiveWell is an American non-profit charity assessment and effective altruism -focused organization. GiveWell focuses primarily on the cost-effectiveness of the organizations that it evaluates, rather than traditional metrics such as the percentage of the organization's budget that is spent on overhead. In , Holden Karnofsky and Elie Hassenfeld, who worked at a hedge fund in Connecticut, formed an informal group with colleagues to evaluate charities based on data and performance metrics similar to those they used at the fund, and were surprised to find the data often didn't exist. In the first year, Karnofsky and Hassenfeld advocated that charities should generally spend more money on overhead, so that they could pay for staff and record keeping to track how effective their efforts were; this ran counter to standard ways of evaluating charities based on the ratio of overhead to funds deployed for the charity work itself. In late , GiveWell's founders promoted the organization on several internet blogs and forums using sockpuppets to ask questions about where to find good information about how to donate and then answering them, recommending GiveWell. In , GiveWell moved its offices to San Francisco where people in Silicon Valley had become strong supporters of the effective altruism philosophy. Givewell's approach is data-driven, and they recommend charities which work in the developing world. Open Philanthropy has investigated giving money to criminal justice reform [13] and a range of other policy areas, [14] and has funded work into mitigating risks of artificial intelligence , [15] [16] [17] biosecurity , [18] and global health. GiveWell makes annual recommendations of the most cost-effective charities.

Skyrim special edition alternate start

Retrieved August 17, Donors based in the U. GiveWell focuses primarily on the cost-effectiveness of the organizations that it evaluates, rather than traditional metrics such as the percentage of the organization's budget that is spent on overhead. We continually assess the work, progress, and future plans of the programs we fund. Please note that GWWC does not evaluate individual charities. For example, we may not have as much confidence in the evidence base or may not have the same extensive history working with the grantee. Effective Altruism Global. We recommend a short list of top charities that we update annually. In other projects. All of our research is free and available to the public. Supporting the Top Charities Fund allows GiveWell to direct funds where they will have the most impact according to its latest cost-effectiveness estimates and research on funding needs. We search for the charities that save or improve lives the most per dollar.

We research each program extensively before funding it, and assess what the program accomplishes with that funding. We look at independent studies, such as randomized controlled trials, of charity programs to understand if they achieve their goals. We also consult experts to gain practical and context-specific insights.

Retrieved August 20, We recommend a short list of top charities that we update annually. Our recommendations are based on the research of third-party, impact-focused charity evaluators our research team has found to be particularly well-suited to help donors do the most good per dollar, according to their recent evaluator investigations. At Giving What We Can, we focus on the effectiveness of an organisation's work -- what the organisation is actually doing and whether their programs are making a big difference. August In other projects. In the first year, Karnofsky and Hassenfeld advocated that charities should generally spend more money on overhead, so that they could pay for staff and record keeping to track how effective their efforts were; this ran counter to standard ways of evaluating charities based on the ratio of overhead to funds deployed for the charity work itself. Our goal is to produce the world's top research on where to give. GiveWell a. Retrieved February 27, Read Edit View history.