Darth maul vs count dooku

This debate comes up a lot, with most seemingly backing Dooku. So in curious how you all rank them in the following categories:.

That would be a close fight but I'd give it to Dooku seven times out of ten. Maul briefly held his own against Sidious who is superior to both of them. While Dooku held his own against Yoda who is superior to both of them. Maul rivals Dooku in saber skills and is physically superior to the Count. Though DOoku is in better shape, is stronger, is faster, and more durable than most men his age there are numerous sources of this just ask and I'll explain. Even so, Maul's physical fitness would help him in such a fight and Maul wouldn't underestimate Dooku as much as the Jedi he struggled against Kenobi and Ahsoka. Maul is stronger than Kenobi throughout TCW.

Darth maul vs count dooku

Darth Vader may be the most famous of Darth Sidious' apprentices, but he wasn't the first. In the beginning there was Darth Maul, stolen from his home on Dathomir and molded into a living weapon by the Dark Lord of the Sith. Both Maul and Tyranus are formidable Sith, with many accomplishments and fallen foes to their names. But which of the two apprentices reigns supreme? Let's compare them and find out. Lightsabers are deadly weapons, oftentimes just as much to their wielders as to their opponents, and mastering the art of dueling with them is not a skill that comes easily. That Maul is able to wield a double-bladed saber with the strength that he does is a testament to his power in the Dark Side. Favoring the longer range provided by the conjoined blades, Maul ferociously wields the saber in a fashion more reminiscent of a staff than a sword, but is no less deadly for it, as many fallen Jedi can attest. There are seven primary forms of Lightsaber combat, with most force wielders choosing to hew primarily to one style. Emphasizing control of the wielder's blade and quick, precise strikes, Makashi was considered the best form for Lightsaber-t0-Lightsaber combat.

Maul is stronger than Kenobi throughout TCW.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen. Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser. Forums New posts. Support Open new ticket. Articles New articles New comments. Log in Register. What's new.

Obviously, neither were the perfect choice for Palpatine, but one had to be better than the other. When The Phantom Menace was announced, fans were understandably thrilled by the prospect of new Star Wars films. However, the two have very different personalities. Maul is an aggressive, acrobatic warrior who charges his enemies, Dooku is much more laid-back and suave. Up to this point in Star Wars, the two Sith we had met were both humans. One was old and disfigured and one spent most of his time under a mask, but they were still human.

Darth maul vs count dooku

Darth Vader may be the most famous of Darth Sidious' apprentices, but he wasn't the first. In the beginning there was Darth Maul, stolen from his home on Dathomir and molded into a living weapon by the Dark Lord of the Sith. Both Maul and Tyranus are formidable Sith, with many accomplishments and fallen foes to their names.

Heracleum moooi

As he was already proficient in the ways of the force when he came under Sidious' tutelage, Dooku evidently had an easier time unfurling lightning than Maul did. Vader vs Tyrannus on Bespin. Ahsoka stated Maul has no chance against Anakin and there's no reason to not believe her given Maul has no feats that suggest otherwise. Dooku's schism from the Jedi was political in origin, for the veteran Jedi Master had grown disillusioned with the corruption rotting the Republic Senate and the Jedi complacently refusing to stop it. Sabers: In this area I will limit myself to say that it can go in favour of either in terms of pure skill, they have different styles, the feats to make a point for either if looked at with neutrality are overflowing, in a battle where the skill is similar the victory would be defended by factors such as stamina, physical capactities, martial skill, the more open and adaptive combat style system, strategic, the pre-cognition habilities in force-users, etc. HelloThere quite well I think since Dooku has never needed dark rage, and he'd forgo the lightning as soon as mace blocked it, dooku is refined enough to contend but that damn shatter point if his might as well be a win button. Pilaf said:. Dooku also uses the force more in his fights and imo he would defeat Maul. I think it has FAR more to do with the individual duelists. Palpatine never intended to keep them as apprentices for too long, as he was seeking someone more powerful. This isn't to say Maul is lacking in this department either, I just doubt he's as talented as Dooku with a blade. Maul even engaged a two on one duel against Windu and Aayla Secura and did fine for a few minutes during Son of Dathomir when the Jedi were chasing him; Dooku at Boz Pity crapped himself the moment Windu went after him, blind-sided him by TKing SBs into him and ran the fuck away. But there is no way it would be easy. And in the movie Dooku never shown any struggle against Obi whatsoever.

ShootingNova said:. Agreed with Dooku winning.

I know you know this, but I'm just saying. He might be faster given his ability to fight Obi Wan and Anakin various times in extended fights too. Two words. Either they have some genes that let them use lightning easier, or Maul might just be weaker than them. Kaaant said:. The other was former Master Dooku, whose own fighting style was archaic, yet stunningly effective. Both Maul and Dooku were ultimately deceived by Palpatine and prevented from fulfilling their true potential as Sith Lords. Let's look at their feats:. Given that's not what the story creators wanted, it's clear he holds Maul below the level he should be. But which of the two apprentices reigns supreme?