Dall-e porn

This Website is for use solely by individuals at least dall-e porn old or the age of consent in the jurisdiction from which you are accessing the Website. The materials that are available on this Website include graphic visual depictions and descriptions of nudity and sexual activity and must not be accessed by anyone who is under years old and the age of consent. Visiting this Website if you are under years old and the age of consent might be prohibited dall-e porn the law of your jurisdiction. After all, the website This Vagina Does Not Exist has been online for at least three years, dall-e porn, generating endless images of nonexistent female genitalia, dall-e porn.

I just wanted to let everyone know, If you get the description right, you can generate hyper realistic nsfw images. Since some parts of human anatomy really don't differ in looks, It only takes the AI a very vague knowledge of how to regenerate a new image of something like that. I don't know exactly how they filter out nsfw imagery, but one of the largest concerns they always had was not just filter out terms, it was people could use loopholes to describe something without actually asking for a blatant nsfw image. Now if you don't know what that's supposed to look like then that's your problem, but its hard for the computer to filter these things, and it becomes a bigger problem when the images generated are so realistic like the real Dall-e 2. When it comes to descriptions, there are a lot of things that resemble other things that arent as good. But how would you filter explicit imagery??? If you generate the image and then post-generation a computer decides that your image is nsfw, then there can be false positives that arise.

Dall-e porn

I will resolve this to YES if it is possible to do so upon release. If not, I will wait for 1 month before resolution, during which time, we can try different techniques. I've had a fair bit of success generating gory and violence related images but it is refusing the pornographic images to my naive attempts. It's quite good at generating violence related things, such as this. ChatGPT says directly that context matters, so that representations of classical art etc are allowed, but it would refuse a request that was explicitly for a pornographic image. That is not something they are going to patch since it was intentional. When does this start counting, in 6 days the 1 month since release, or is it anytime between 6 days from now and end of January? Fedor Nice, this works for me after a few attempts. If a consistently working prompt is eventually discovered but OpenAI patches it one hour later, for example, is that a YES? I expect the market will react to such a news, but I will not resolve based off a floating prompt that has since been patched. That is why the market is open for 1 month, at the end of which if there are several such prompts that are being proactively patched by OpenAI, then yes, I will consider those.

The similar issue of 3D-printed guns has developed in parallel over the past decade as democratized manufacturing became a reality. Sargos on April 8, root parent dall-e porn [—] There are tons of legal medical images of that content as well, dall-e porn.

I think that using something like this for porn could potentially offer the biggest benefit to society. So much has been said about how this industry exploits young and vulnerable models. Cheap autogenerated images and in the future videos would pretty much remove the demand for human models and eliminate the related suffering, no? EDIT: typo. Depends whether you think models should be able to generate cp.

But competing products like Microsoft's Copilot are entering the fray with enticing features, and there are a good few reasons you should give Copilot a try over ChatGPT. While GPT If you don't really need a ChatGPT-specific feature, the choice is simple. However, you can only do that with a ChatGPT premium plan. With Copilot, on the other hand, you can access the internet with a free account—you don't even need an account to access the internet on Copilot.

Dall-e porn

By Roberto Molar Candanosa. A new test of popular AI image generators shows that while they're supposed to make only G-rated pictures, they can be hacked to create content that's not suitable for work. Most online art generators are purported to block violent, pornographic, and other types of questionable content. But Johns Hopkins University researchers manipulated two of the better-known systems to create exactly the kind of images the products' safeguards are supposed to exclude. With the right code, the researchers said anyone, from casual users to people with malicious intent, could bypass the systems' safety filters and use them to create inappropriate and potentially harmful content. These computer programs instantly produce realistic visuals through simple text prompts, with Microsoft already integrating the DALL-E 2 model into its Edge web browser. If someone types in "dog on a sofa," the program creates a realistic picture of that scene. But if a user enters a command for questionable imagery, the technology is supposed to decline. The team tested the systems with a novel algorithm named Sneaky Prompt.

F8 bilişim

In the same theme, I liked the comments of both of you. In , will an AI be able to generate a full high-quality movie to a prompt? Surely a more full-body version, complete with customizable physical characteristics determined by its users, is not far off. OK, so I'm new to all this and trying to get my head around stuff. Please tell me your being sarcastic… This is arguably the most insipid and stupid crippling of a powerful tool for content creation I can think of. More importantly, I have never had the urge to seek out same. Creating the imagery does happen in humans' minds. Some people are interested in what's taboo and off limits and so long as they are approaching or just crossing that line, they're happy. Please login for a better experience Stream high quality, download, add favorites, comment, and more! I'm not sure I agree with the statement, you're putting forth a lot of assertions without the actual quantitative data to back up what you're saying, and even though you think it sounds intuitive that doesn't necessarily make it valid. I am assuming that any adult reading this understands that professional porn is quite different from the sex most of us experience in our private lives in a number of major ways, both emotionally and physically. I cut my exploration short. First video clips were with the faces of your usual celebrities, but then suddenly I got "treated" to Greta Thunberg in the situations you might expect.

DALL-E is an artificial intelligence model that can generate images when you feed it textual descriptions.

We should continue to have limits on the availability of porn. One could imagine a cyberpunk future where seedy AI cp images are swapped in an AR universe, generated by models ran by underground hackers that scrounge together what resources they can to power the behemoth models that they stole via hacks. JohnBooty on April 7, root parent prev next [—]. I've seen them today. Get over yourselfs porn haters. It'd be ironic if we ended up destroying our planet by using so much electricity to train models to generate a maximally optimal version of the type of content that you refer to similar to crypto mining. I just wanted to let everyone know, If you get the description right, you can generate hyper realistic nsfw images. The materials that are available on this Website include graphic visual depictions and descriptions of nudity and sexual activity and must not be accessed by anyone who is under years old and the age of consent. Is there something inherently wrong with porn? We have limits on the availability of various other artificial stimulants. They are only consumers of existing technology. Synaesthesia on April 7, prev next [—]. I will resolve this to YES if it is possible to do so upon release. Did you enjoy your lunch? They need cooking, and if you are cooking anyway, mixing artificial and "natural" ingredients can even be a problem than a positive.