Blockshopper

Our promise. We provide a buying advantage blockshopper verified reviews and unbiased editorial research.

A small Web site was launched in called Blockshopper. The site has taken public records from county recorders offices around the country and compiled lists of data by neighborhood block for as many homes on that block as possible. You can search the site by inputting any street address and up comes a list of all the homes on the same block in list form. The list includes the address, the names of the homeowner s , the date of purchase and the price paid. Beyond that, the Web site selects and profiles specific sellers and buyers, identifying them by name, occupation and place of employment and then also links to the various Web sites with additional data on the individual buyer or seller.

Blockshopper

.

So, blockshopper, okay. Is this truly a matter of First Amendment rights? Page 1 Reviews 0 -

.

A tech entrepreneur and a local investor bought the early s building at N. Milwaukee Ave. Ian Luscombe, senior director of commercial real estate firm CRER, said the buyers plan to gut rehab the apartments and keep the businesses that wish to remain in the building. Luscombe, who represented the sellers and the buyers, declined to comment further on the buyers, saying only that one of them does business out of Israel. The deal also highlights the rising cost of living in the gentrifying neighborhood. Sierra and her family have long owned a tire and auto shop in the building, which they plan to relocate elsewhere in Chicago if they can find a suitable location, Sierra said. The buyers beat out four other offers, Luscombe said.

Blockshopper

Major trustee. Loos Seller: Mussato trust. Waterman Seller: Donald B. Rhebergen Seller: Galen G Malick. McQuaid trustee. Pulice Seller: David J. Cunningham trustee Seller: Linda L Luzbetak.

Us bank southern ca routing number

And if harassment or threats are the result of these postings of private addresses, they will only remove address information if provided confidential court and police records confirming harassment or threats. The case was recently settled. G Seattle, WA. The other action that everyone should be taking is to report these despicable actions to the hosting site Go Daddy. J Tomball, TX. I find it literally unbelievable that BlockShopper will NOT remove your information by simply asking them to opt out. My first request to have my name and address removed was met with the statement that I would have to provide proof I was either a law enforcement individual or else I was involved in a protection order. I am neither. Deep breath. This violates my privacy and borders on criminal behavior. We value your privacy. They told me it requires crime with a police report first to be be removed. Not sure how to choose? Jennifer Sacramento, CA.

Our promise. We provide a buying advantage with verified reviews and unbiased editorial research. This profile has not been claimed by the company.

When I buy a home does that mean I subject myself to being profiled on Blockshopper. My request was denied. Susan Beverly Hills, CA. When contacted with a request to remove personal information the reply is the following form statement:. This is a horrible organization that refuses to take off your personal information. However, as an attorney and a long time advocate and counselor of battered women this Web site gives me great concern, especially in light of the effect of Google. The phone number is most likely linked to the last pay phone on earth considering how much they do not answer. Thanks A 21 Thanks for your vote! It is against the law to publicly post law enforcement officers' names and addresses, but this company continues to do so, even after multiple requests to remove. This violates my privacy and borders on criminal behavior. The site has taken public records from county recorders offices around the country and compiled lists of data by neighborhood block for as many homes on that block as possible. Login to post comments. However, it is apparent that the safety concerns this invasion of privacy creates have not been subject to the scrutiny of the Courts.