Appreciation of the poem nose versus eyes

This poem is humorous in nature and also has satirical element mocking the Legal System. Here the poet, William Cowper, emphasizes the pitfalls of taking something at face value without empathy or common sense. The nose and the eyes have come to the court to settle the ownership dispute of the spectacles.

Our website uses cookies to improve your experience. Learn more. Your opinion about the poem. The poet William Cowper is famous for his satirical work. It pokes fun at some absurd decisions arrived at in jurisprudence when the law is applied without human discretion and thought. The nose and eyes are sensory organs that symbolise human behaviour.

Appreciation of the poem nose versus eyes

Brainstorming A5 i. Write the appreciation of the poem. The poet William Cowper is famous for his satirical work. It pokes fun at some absurd decisions arrived at in jurisprudence when the law is applied without human discretion and thought. The nose and eyes are sensory organs that symbolise human behaviour. The theme is about typical human behavior in the society which is greedy. People who grab something which is not theirs and depride those who deserve it. The poem is in stanzas of four lines each, The first and third, and the second and fourth lines rhyme in each. The sensory organs are personified. The eyes and nose are the parties fighting the cakes, claiming ownership of the spectacles. The tongue is the lawyer ; the ear is the chief baron — The judge. The tongue is attributed with the qualities of skillful argument and learning.

Bed in Summer Bed in Summer.

.

It also mocks at the stone-blind justice in a humorous manner emphasizing the lack of empathy and common sense. The poet was one of the most popular 18th century English poets and composers of hymns. His poems deal with nature and everyday life. He is aptly described by Samuel T. There was a dispute between the nose and the eyes and the reason behind the dispute was to whom do the spectacles belong. We are aware that the spectacles are meant for eyes but here both the eyes and the nose wanted to have their claim on the spectacles.

Appreciation of the poem nose versus eyes

In this Article we give complete information regarding Poem The Poet is satirical work. Poet who beautifully displayed the unusual argument between the nose and the eyes. The nose and eyes are sensory organs that symbolize human behavior.

Picunt

The tongue is the lawyer ; the ear is the chief baron — The judge. On other hand, the ears do not do their part in discerning the deeper meaning and gives verdict based on nonsensical argument. The highlight of the poem is the personification of the eyes, nose, and tongue. The tongue is also given the quality of shifting loyalties and double speak. Anterior no carrossel. The Tongue did his job perfectly with the help of intelligent reasoning in favour of the Nose for being the legitimate owner of the spectacles. The fact that ears decree that eyes should remain shut whenever nose puts on spectacles clearly shows the drawbacks of blind justice. The same lawyer speaks in favour of both the rivals and the deliberate attempt to present vague arguments for the second client add to the element of humour but it also hints at the justice that is denied. The poem is unique in that, it is a gentle criticism of the judicial system. The ear is spoken of as having good judgement. The sensory organs are personified. The eyes and nose are the parties fighting the cakes, claiming ownership of the spectacles. He also pronounced a verdict for the Eyes to keep themselves shut whenever the spectacles are worn.

The poem Nose versus Eyes is written by the great and most popular 18th-century poet William Cowper. The poem is about the dispute on the matter of who belongs to the spectacles.

The tongue is their lawyer, who argues for both sides without worrying about the truth. Overall, the poet mocks the judicial system in humorous way, and gives message to readers to use their sensory organs in proper way. Criticism of the judiciary is dangerous and could even land one into troue. Previous Post Next Post. In a court of justice, injustice was served to the eyes. It shows how the weak are unable to defend themselves. It pokes fun at some absurd decisions arrived at in jurisprudence when the law is applied without human discretion and thought. Sign me up. On other hand, the ears do not do their part in discerning the deeper meaning and gives verdict based on nonsensical argument. But the learned judge, the all-powerful Ear, even after being very attentive and prudent, could not make head or tail of the arguments in favour of the Eyes. The nose and the eyes have come to the court to settle the ownership dispute of the spectacles. English Language English Language. Anterior no carrossel. Website Built with WordPress. The tongue is the lawyer ; the ear is the chief baron — The judge.