Apmex lawsuit

San Francisco — May 23, — Cooley successfully defended its client Liberty Coin, apmex lawsuit, a retailer specializing in precious metals, in an antitrust claims case filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California, ending more than two years of litigation. In Februarya competing online reseller filed a complaint alleging Liberty Coin and multiple other apmex lawsuit of coins and precious metals entered into agreements to set predatory prices for their products sold online in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, and had engaged apmex lawsuit discriminatory pricing in violation of the Robinson-Patman Act. Lego duplo baseplate successfully defeated three motions to dismiss, arguing that the plaintiff did not have antitrust standing, and had not plausibly pleaded a horizontal conspiracy, a plausible relevant market, that the defendants had set discriminatory prices, or that the defendants could recoup their alleged below-cost sales, apmex lawsuit.

This docket was last retrieved on May 14, These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia. Why Is My Information Online? Subscribe to Justia's Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state court opinions. Apmex, Inc. RSS Track this Docket.

Apmex lawsuit

.

The case is A World Trade, Inc. Elizabeth M Al-Dajani. San Francisco — May 23, — Cooley successfully defended its client Liberty Coin, apmex lawsuit, a retailer specializing in precious metals, in an antitrust claims case filed apmex lawsuit the US District Court for the Central District of California, ending more than two years of litigation.

.

Other - Antitrust. District Courts. California Central District Court. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Maria A. District Courts Contract CV Courts Of Appeals Other Why is this public record being published online?

Apmex lawsuit

This docket was last retrieved on May 14, These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia. Why Is My Information Online?

Ruger 9mm takedown magpul

Thrasher, Lupe. This content is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction and you should not act or refrain from acting based on this content. In February , a competing online reseller filed a complaint alleging Liberty Coin and multiple other sellers of coins and precious metals entered into agreements to set predatory prices for their products sold online in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, and had engaged in discriminatory pricing in violation of the Robinson-Patman Act. By accessing this content, you agree that the information provided does not constitute legal or other professional advice. Law Students. Farrell, Edmund. US State Law. This docket was last retrieved on May 14, Gross, Jonathan. Garo B Ghazarian. Other Databases. Lawrence Hecimovich. Associate Julia R. Do not send any confidential information to Cooley, as we do not have any duty to keep any information you provide to us confidential.

Other - Antitrust.

Bauch, Jim. Associate Julia R. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Karnig S Kerkonian. Law Students. Lawrence Hecimovich. Other error s with document s : Please note that electronic, image or stamp signatures are not allowed. Farrell, Edmund. Subscribe to Justia's Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state court opinions. Related news. San Francisco — May 23, — Cooley successfully defended its client Liberty Coin, a retailer specializing in precious metals, in an antitrust claims case filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California, ending more than two years of litigation.